Professorial Blogitude

In Defense of Twilight

Posted by: Professor Anonymous on: 9 January 2009

So I avoided reading Twilight for a long time, partly because most everyone I talked to about it either loved it unconditionally or kept complaining about the whiny nature of the main character Bella, the utter “teenage”hood of the book, or other such points of displeasure. I accepted these words, these criticisms, and just kept my nose out of the book…

Until recently.

My defense of Twilight comes from this angle, from someone encouraged NOT to read the series because of its flaws. I’ve never seen the movie but I’ve certainly seen a lot of the trailers and ads for it, so I’ve already got the two main characters (Bella and Edward) stuck in my mind. I have also read Stephanie Meyer before (The Host is one of my favorite contemporary books) and I know a bit about her as an author. So. I picked up Twilight not expecting much, thinking I might get a kick out of some cheap romance story….

So wrong.

Yes, it is a love story. Yes, it is doomed from the beginning. Yes, it involves hearing every moment from the perspective of a 17 year old girl who has like, zero self confidence and can be a bit helpless at times. BUT. but but but. I’d argue that Meyer’s real talent lies in two areas: moving the storyline forward through her amazingly adept descriptions of emotional interplay between characters, and re-building a famous mythical being to fit her well-tailored literary world.

Bella is young. And whiny, and unsure of herself, and ridiculous at times. But not to a degree that it’s not believable or even annoying. (At least in this first book.) I was not her when I was younger, I was the boisterous giddy girl who was everyone’s friend and was always talking. She’s quiet, reserved, just wants to fit in, blah blah blah. But you know what? I didn’t HAVE to be her to get her. I knew that Meyer had already grown up as her, as Bella, and that this story probably first sparked when she was daydreaming as a 17 year old Mormon girl about her own possible romantic interactions with the boys around her. I feel like, because I know the author and what she’s been through, Bella has a special place in my heart as forgiveably human. She’s insecure at the right moments, she’s strong and passionate in the right moments, she’s just… spot on.

Another thing that might annoy readers is Bella’s fragility and damsel-in-distress nature. She’s seemingly helpless at most any given point in the book, and there’s a lot of man-handling by the super-strong Edward that goes on throughout the novel. Again, this just reminds me of Meyer’s own romantic preferences and it echoes the interaction between male and female in her other novel as well. She’s obviously grown up in a world where the female is fragile, needs protection, can show strength at times but also needs rescuing, and the male is meant to be that salvation. I’m NOT calling her sexist or anything, not by a long shot… I’m just saying I think those who have criticized her for being so can’t really see where she’s coming from.

The writing is fantastic. It captivates you, forces you to pay attention to who’s reading whose face, who can’t understand whose comments, etc etc. She also has a PERFECT grasp on how to flesh out the hesitant flirtation and frustration of a brand new teenage relationship. She’s like, a literary cock-tease. When the lovers FINALLY kiss it’s like a release of tension that couldn’t be better if there were penetration involved. And her ability to build up this tension, to describe this romantic back and forth between the two, totally disguises the fact that these kids are confessing their undying love to each other halfway through a novel that has held NO REAL BASIS for this love. I mean, if you look at is as a rational adult, they’ve flirted in school, he’s “rescued” her several times but hasn’t actually talked to her, they have nothing in common… and then they’re saying they love each other before the torrent of questions to get to know each other.

Hmm.

Only in a world cemented by that unfathomable but undeniable pull of the teenage crush could such claims of love be taken seriously. And I do. In fact, after this first book I’m rooting for Bella to become a vampire herself.

The concept of a vampire is re-shaped, re-molded to fit a different world, a contemporary world. Meyer knows her way around science fiction, she’s proven that in her adult fiction, so her adaptation of this ancient myth is extremely well done and believable. Bella’s encounter with Edward in the halls of an average Oregon high school are exactly what I’d imagine meeting a real vampire would be like. Something’s off, something’s odd, but you can’t quite place it until you’ve been enveloped in the absurd truth.

Mmkay, I think that’s enough of my defense. The quality of writing, the finite understanding of the teenage brain in love, and the ability to help the reader over the hurtles of fantasy are what have convinced me to take a stand for Twilight. Now, it’s on to the next book in the series.

3 Responses to "In Defense of Twilight"

There’s a really interesting article on the whole series in this month’s issue of Bitch. Remind me to make a copy of it for you.

You know what’s worse, or ironic? I read the books, and enjoyed them – cute stories, very fun and light read. And now, because they’re being talked about and the franchise is bringing in millions and millions, people just need to shred them to pieces.

I read the article by Bitch magazine and I couldn’t believe it. They took the plot and and characters and turned everything into a feminist argument. I’m all for women doing their own thing – but I truly do not see Edward as manipulative and ‘wrong’ for Bella (in terms of personality and caring, not his ‘thirst for blood’ obviously). He’s a vampire – for one, and hasn’t anybody read stories about vampires?! They’re way more violent and primitive than the Twilight series. And, Edward LOVES Bella and protects her, and how is this anti-feminist? He doesn’t even try to sleep with her! He’s a gentleman and he treats her right, and she’s clumsy as hell and gets herself in loads of unpleasant situations (I’ve been there!) and god forbid he helps her. God forbid a man opens the door for you nowadays!

Girls today are putting up with A LOT of sexist shit for guys their age, and this book should be an example of the love and caring that they deserve. Instead it’s being torn into pieces because of what – Edward’s thirst for Bella? Come on. Again, pick up the Brotherhood series, or Anne Rice’s novels, and get with the times.

Also, it’s apparent that most of the journalists did not read past Twilight. I’ve heard a lot of people saying that the obvious GOOD choice for Bella would have been Jacob. Wait, what?! HE turns into a manipulative jerk and forces himself on her in one of the next books. Another argument used : Jacob would not harm Bella. As a werewolf, it’s proven in another book that a ‘girlfriend’ can be harmed by the man when he is changing into his wolf shape.

These arguments and suppositions can be very infuriating when they’re not even based on knowledge of the books.

Christina: Yeah, I could feel the potential for serious sexist accusations when I started reading the first book, and that’s why I mentioned why a lot of the man-handling and whatnot did not bother me. The truth is that everyone has to rip apart whatever’s new or popular; I’m just surprised these books aren’t being petitioned by the same people who hated Harry Potter for their reflection of dark arts. *rolls eyes*

Leave a Reply