<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Twilight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/in-defense-of-twilight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/in-defense-of-twilight/</link>
	<description>Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Suck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prof H</title>
		<link>http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/in-defense-of-twilight/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=311#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Christina: Yeah, I could feel the potential for serious sexist accusations when I started reading the first book, and that&#039;s why I mentioned why a lot of the man-handling and whatnot did not bother me. The truth is that everyone has to rip apart whatever&#039;s new or popular; I&#039;m just surprised these books aren&#039;t being petitioned by the same people who hated Harry Potter for their reflection of dark arts. *rolls eyes*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina: Yeah, I could feel the potential for serious sexist accusations when I started reading the first book, and that&#8217;s why I mentioned why a lot of the man-handling and whatnot did not bother me. The truth is that everyone has to rip apart whatever&#8217;s new or popular; I&#8217;m just surprised these books aren&#8217;t being petitioned by the same people who hated Harry Potter for their reflection of dark arts. *rolls eyes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/in-defense-of-twilight/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=311#comment-336</guid>
		<description>You know what&#039;s worse, or ironic? I read the books, and enjoyed them - cute stories, very fun and light read. And now, because they&#039;re being talked about and the franchise is bringing in millions and millions, people just need to shred them to pieces.

I read the article by Bitch magazine and I couldn&#039;t believe it. They took the plot and and characters and turned everything into a feminist argument. I&#039;m all for women doing their own thing - but I truly do not see Edward as manipulative and &#039;wrong&#039; for Bella (in terms of personality and caring, not his &#039;thirst for blood&#039; obviously). He&#039;s a vampire - for one, and hasn&#039;t anybody read stories about vampires?! They&#039;re way more violent and primitive than the Twilight series. And, Edward LOVES Bella and protects her, and how is this anti-feminist? He doesn&#039;t even try to sleep with her! He&#039;s a gentleman and he treats her right, and she&#039;s clumsy as hell and gets herself in loads of unpleasant situations (I&#039;ve been there!) and god forbid he helps her. God forbid a man opens the door for you nowadays! 

Girls today are putting up with A LOT of sexist shit for guys their age, and this book should be an example of the love and  caring that they deserve. Instead it&#039;s being torn into pieces because of what - Edward&#039;s thirst for Bella? Come on. Again, pick up the Brotherhood series, or Anne Rice&#039;s novels, and get with the times.

Also, it&#039;s apparent that most of the journalists did not read past Twilight. I&#039;ve heard a lot of people saying that the obvious GOOD choice for Bella would have been Jacob. Wait, what?! HE turns into a manipulative jerk and forces himself on her in one of the next books. Another argument used : Jacob would not harm Bella. As a werewolf, it&#039;s proven in another book that a &#039;girlfriend&#039; can be harmed by the man when he is changing into his wolf shape. 

These arguments and suppositions can be very infuriating when they&#039;re not even based on knowledge of the books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what&#8217;s worse, or ironic? I read the books, and enjoyed them &#8211; cute stories, very fun and light read. And now, because they&#8217;re being talked about and the franchise is bringing in millions and millions, people just need to shred them to pieces.</p>
<p>I read the article by Bitch magazine and I couldn&#8217;t believe it. They took the plot and and characters and turned everything into a feminist argument. I&#8217;m all for women doing their own thing &#8211; but I truly do not see Edward as manipulative and &#8216;wrong&#8217; for Bella (in terms of personality and caring, not his &#8216;thirst for blood&#8217; obviously). He&#8217;s a vampire &#8211; for one, and hasn&#8217;t anybody read stories about vampires?! They&#8217;re way more violent and primitive than the Twilight series. And, Edward LOVES Bella and protects her, and how is this anti-feminist? He doesn&#8217;t even try to sleep with her! He&#8217;s a gentleman and he treats her right, and she&#8217;s clumsy as hell and gets herself in loads of unpleasant situations (I&#8217;ve been there!) and god forbid he helps her. God forbid a man opens the door for you nowadays! </p>
<p>Girls today are putting up with A LOT of sexist shit for guys their age, and this book should be an example of the love and  caring that they deserve. Instead it&#8217;s being torn into pieces because of what &#8211; Edward&#8217;s thirst for Bella? Come on. Again, pick up the Brotherhood series, or Anne Rice&#8217;s novels, and get with the times.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s apparent that most of the journalists did not read past Twilight. I&#8217;ve heard a lot of people saying that the obvious GOOD choice for Bella would have been Jacob. Wait, what?! HE turns into a manipulative jerk and forces himself on her in one of the next books. Another argument used : Jacob would not harm Bella. As a werewolf, it&#8217;s proven in another book that a &#8216;girlfriend&#8217; can be harmed by the man when he is changing into his wolf shape. </p>
<p>These arguments and suppositions can be very infuriating when they&#8217;re not even based on knowledge of the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirgoProf</title>
		<link>http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/in-defense-of-twilight/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>VirgoProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=311#comment-334</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a really interesting article on the whole series in this month&#039;s issue of Bitch. Remind me to make a copy of it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a really interesting article on the whole series in this month&#8217;s issue of Bitch. Remind me to make a copy of it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
